Abstract
The heart piece of libertarian anarchism lies at its unique representation of a law of nature. Far from any theory viewing government as katechon against the brute nature of men, either in the power of a strong withholder of the doors of hell as in Hobbesian political philosophy or as an inner divine voice of self-preservation that guides people by means of binding socialcontracts as John Locke proposed, individual anarchism believes that no such katechon is
required. Human nature is the very key to social order. Natural human beings are free and
based on the paradigm of praxeology they find the mutual agreements that most suit them by their spontaneous impulse to strive for opportunities favouring their personal interests without artificial constrains. Even though individual anarchism cannot promise heaven, it explains the causal relations between justice and freedom. If private property is a sufficient principle for mutual benevolence in human convivial order is still an open question in libertarianism. Hans-Hermann Hoppe, as the herald of anarcho-capitalism, defends this position while Frank van Dun has a more sceptic opinion on the logical relation between property and liberty. What they share is the idea of argumentation as a decisive in the constitution of personhood and justice among persons.
